In R v Linekar [1995] QB 250, a prostitute stated the fact that she would not have consented to sexual intercourse if she had known that her client was not intending to pay, but there was no fraud-induced consent as to the nature of the activity, nor was the identity of the client relevant. The case of five men jailed for engaging in consensual sadomasochistic sexual acts is one of the few judgments that most law students actually read, and the facts tend to stay with them.
R V Brown: Where are we now? | North East Law Talk - Newcastle University R V STEPHEN ROY EMMETT (1999) PUBLISHED June 18, 1999. This article has no summary. grand united order of odd fellows Menu Toggle; coastal vacation rentals holden beach The men in the Brown case had argued that consent should provide a defence to the charges on the basis that people have the right to deal with their own body and the law should not punish consensual achievement of sexual satisfaction.
R v Brown 1993 - e-lawresources.co.uk THE COURT'S jurisdiction to refuse to grant an injunction where there had been a violation of a right and instead to grant damages was good in principle for both negative and positive obligations. Only full case reports are accepted in court. Silica nanoparticles (SNPs) have shown promise in biomedical applications such as drug delivery and imaging due to their versatile synthetic methods, tunable physicochemical properties, and ability to load both hydrophilic and hydrophobic cargo with high efficiency. As an application of parens patriae, for example, minors cannot consent to having sexual intercourse under a specified age even though the particular instance of statutory rape might be a "victimless" offense. The activity had in fact been ongoing for more than ten years and the participants had "positively wanted, asked for, the acts to be done to them . It was not therefore necessary to show ongoing dishonesty at the date when a notice of intervention was served. R v Emmett (1999) - plastic bag over head and setting fire to breasts - defence not allowed - held that so violent it moved . Their BrunauerEmmett-Teller (BET) surface area is 584 and 672 m 2 g 1, respectively, with corresponding pore volume of 0.33 cm 3 g 1 and 0.38 cm 3 g 1. R v Emmett [1999] EWCA Crim 1710; Case No. In R v Slingsby [1995], the defendant penetrated the complainant's vagina with his fingers, and in the process accidentally cutting her with the signet ring he had on. The more modern authorities involving the transmission of psychological conditions and in other sexual matters, reject the notion that consent can be a defence to anything more than a trivial injury. The Government "[was] particularly concerned that the law should not seem to discriminate against those who are HIV positive, have AIDS or viral Hepatitis or who carry any kind of disease".
Lactic Acidosis: From Sour Milk to Septic Shock - Pamela J. Fall Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in, Please refresh your browser to be logged in, 5% off all bookings with this Travelodge discount code, Save 200 on 2023 holidays with this TUI discount code, Extra 20% off selected fashion and sportswear at Very, 50 cash with friend referrals at Virgin Mobile, Compare broadband packages side by side to find the best deal for you, Compare cheap broadband deals from providers with fastest speed in your area, All you need to know about fibre broadband, Best Apple iPhone Deals in the UK February 2023, Compare iPhone contract deals and get the best offer this February, Compare the best mobile phone deals from the top networks and brands. The Coney case concerned spectators at a prize fight who were prosecuted as secondary participants in any offence committed by the .
R v Jobidon | Case Brief Wiki | Fandom Chromium, especially hexavalent chromium, can be released into the environment from a variety of industrial sources, like leather processing and finishing, steel processing, ceramic processing, electroplating, catalytic manufacture and drilling muds (Barnhart, 1997, Darrie, 2001, Jacobs and Testa, 2005).Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is the most common Cr species, is highly toxic . Leaving aside repugnance and moral objection, both of which are entirely natural, but neither of which are in my opinion grounds upon which the court could properly create a new crime..
r v emmett 1999 case summary Kidnapping may be established by carrying away by fraud. Case report and review of the . Click the column heading to activate the filter (the heading will become Red). To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. To recap Part 1. . J Nephrol. The act was considered comparable to tattooing, whilst Brown applied specifically to sadomasochism. On the second, she suffered burns, which became infected. 2002;15:398-402.
Diagnostics | Free Full-Text | [18F]FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of The document also included supporting commentary from author Jonathan Herring..
A contemporary critique of R v Brown and the legal status of consensual If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary defines crime as; "act (usually grave offence) punishable by law; evil act; such acts collectively" It will be noted that many crimes are also torts and vice-versa. shane kilcher house; ridge hill apartments for rent; example of psycholinguistics in daily life; beda appointment dan meeting di outlook; .
Consent (criminal law) - Wikipedia If an individual who knows that he is suffering from HIV conceals this stark fact from his sexual partner, the principle of her personal autonomy is not enhanced if he is exculpated when he recklessly transmits HIV to her through consensual sexual intercourse. The problem has always been to decide at what level the victim's consent becomes ineffective. But, Sharpston laments, it remained just a report that never made it into the criminal law. A paper on the website The Student Lawyer examined the basis for fraud as grounds for negating consent, in the context of the decision not to charge officers involved in the UK undercover policing relationships scandal. In NSW, there may be no consent where a complainant was "substantially intoxicated by alcohol or any drug". The majority, who found the conduct vile and disgusting, thought the case was about violence being done, which they thought had nothing to do with sex, she says. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Firstpost Homes Ltd v Johnson and Others: CA 14 Aug 1995, Regina v Brown (Anthony); Regina v Lucas; etc, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. The defendant was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm contrary to section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Immunotherapy is based on manipulation of the immune system in order to act against tumour cells, with growing evidence especially in melanoma patients. In each case, their sexual partners would not have consented had they known the truth and a reasonable person might be expected to realise this.
Sw. Bell Tel., L.P. v. Emmett, 459 S.W.3d 578 | Casetext Search + Citator The disagreement over whether the case was about violence or sex, led to the 3:2 split between the judges. Judgement for the case R v Wilson. The law says consent is a defence to the intentional infliction of harm in activities from surgery and circumcision to tattooing, ear-piercing and violent sports such as boxing and rugby. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. In 2000, the government repeated that view in a consultation relating to the law on manslaughter, "The Government remains wholly committed to this approach." Maouloud Baby v. State of Maryland was a 2007 case in the Maryland Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, which determined that a person may withdraw sexual consent after having given it, and that the continuation of sexual activity after the withdrawal of consent constitutes rape. Most states have laws which criminalize misrepresentations, deceptions, and fraud. These are situations in which a victim may have given apparent consent to parting with ownership or possession of money and/or goods, or to generally suffering a loss, but this consent is treated as vitiated by the dishonesty of the person making the untrue representations. We do not provide advice. Stephen Auld QC (Pinsent Cutis, Birmingham) for the plaintiffs; Christopher Vajda QC, George Peretz (Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants. On August 28, 1955, while visiting family in Money, Mississippi, 14-year-old Emmett Till, an African American from Chicago, is brutally murdered for allegedly flirting with a white woman four. .See Also Regina v Emmett (Stephen Roy) CACD 15-Oct-1999 When the CPS intends to seek an order for costs against a defendant, in future, the defendant must be given notice of the intention to make the application. Summary Offence One that is tried in the District Court. If the citation column does not include a hyperlink, then copyright restrictions prevent BAILII from publishing the judgment (missing cases may be available on other commercial/paywalled sites). Until recently, the case has never been challenged, but its current status was complicated by the then general assumptions that "infliction" required some act of violence, and that non-physical injuries could not be inflicted and so were outside the scope of the Offences Against the Person Act. The court applied Brown and ruled that the woman's consent to these events did not provide a defence for her partner.
Criminal Law - British and Irish Legal Information Institute Examples given by the author included:[10]. On any view, the concealment of this fact from her almost inevitably means that she is deceived. Myles Jackman, a leading obscenity lawyer, says the Brown case is still the legal guideline for bodily autonomy, agency, consent in sexual relations and body modification. In my opinion it should be a case about the criminal law of private sexual relations, if about anything at all, said Lord Mustill said. The court held that, even if the victim had consented to a being restrained and gagged, his consent was invalid because there was no way for him to communicate its withdrawal once the gag was in his mouth.[4].
Pahlen | Painful TV | Entertainment and Sports Law Journal Till was born to working-class parents on the South Side of Chicago. ALTHOUGH R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 was not authority in all circumstances for the proposition that consent did not form a basis for a defence in cases of sado-masochistic prac-tices, nevertheless when the realistic risk was of more than transient injury the issue of consent became immaterial.
SciELO - Brasil - Breastfeeding duration and eating behavior in early 1.Introduction. [5], Alzheimer's disease or similar disabilities may result in a person being unable to give legal consent to sexual relations even with their spouse.
Judicial review; assisted suicide; euthanasia; necessity; ECHR Art.8, Child; effective participation in trial; ECHR Art.6, Insanity; automatism; epilepsy; non-fatal assault: GBH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; non-fatal assault: ABH, Insanity; automatism; diabetes; TWOC; disqualified driving, Insanity: 'nature and quality of act'; murder, Insanity; automatism; mental disorder; voluntary intoxication; voluntary control, Attorney-General's Reference (No. Facts: The two defendants broke into a woman's home.One went upstairs and took some jewellery from her bedroom. He said again that this had been consensual. Timothy Dutton QC (Wright Son & Pepper) for the Law Society; Ian McCulloch, Nigel Brockley (Straw & Pearce, Loughborough) for the solicitor. On the first occasion he tied a plastic bag over the head of his partner. Following a campaign by the group We Cant Consent to This, an amendment to the domestic violence bill seeks to establish in legislation the legal principle from Brown that a person cannot consent to actual bodily harm or other more serious injury. are mint imperials bad for your teeth; kooper davis death hobbs, nm. . 6 and 8, National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes East Ltd, Corporate liability; vicarious liability; pollution, Strict liability, corporate liability; pollution, Corporate liability: identification doctrine; Trade Descriptions Act, Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission, Attorney General's Reference (No.2 of 1999), Corporate liability: identification doctrine; manslaughter, R v HM Coroner for East Kent, ex p. Spooner, Judicial Review: coroner's inquest; corporate liability: aggregation; manslaughter, Corporate liability; attribution; fraud; mens rea, Consent; sado-masochism; indecent assault, Attorney Generals Reference (No 6 of 1980), Consent; fighting; bodily injury; non-fatal assaults, Consent; sado-masochism; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults, Consent; body modification; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults, Consent; sexual activity; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults, Consent; sexually transmitted diseases; non-fatal assaults; GBH, Consent; sexually transmitted diseases; non-fatal assaults, Consent; horseplay; intoxication; non-fatal assaults, Self-defence; innocent third party; imminence of attack, Self-defence; defensive force by instigator of fight; non-fatal assaults, Self-defence; mistake: necessity for defensive force; non-fatal assaults, Self-defence; mistake: necessity for defensive force; murder, Self-defence; mistake; necessity for defensive force; manslaughter, Self-defence; reasonable force; non-fatal assaults, Attorney-General for Northern Ireland's Reference (No 1 of 1975), Self-defence; reasonable force; psychiatric evidence; murder, Self-defence; householder defence; non-fatal assaults, Self-defence; householder defence; Art.2 ECHR; non-fatal assaults, Self-defence; householder defence; murder, Self-defence; failure to retreat; non-fatal assaults, Reasonable excuse; imminence; offensive weapon, Children; corporal punishment; ECHR Art.3, Duress; imminence; voluntary association with criminals; confessions, Duress; threat of serious injury: false imprisonment, Duress of circumstances; necessity; threats to others; freedom of expression; public interest; official secrets, Public interest; freedom of expression; official secrets, Duress of circumstances; necessity; freedom of expression; public interest; official secrets; nature of 'threat'; breaking prison, Duress; indirect threats; conspiracy to supply drugs, Duress; multiple threats; drug importation, Duress; threats: causative of offence; drug importation, Duress; belief in threat: objective standard; reasonable steadfastness; murder, Duress; psychiatric evidence; reasonable steadfastness; drug importation, Duress; reasonable steadfastness; relevant characteristics; obtaining services by deception, Duress; 'learned helplessness', battered woman syndrome; drug importation, Duress of circumstances; reckless driving, Duress of circumstances; driving whilst disqualified, Duress of circumstances; dangerous driving, Duress; duress of circumstances; hijacking, Duress; necessity; prevention of crime: prevention of war; criminal damage: aggravated trespass, Reasonable force; prevention of crime; prevention of war: crime of aggression; criminal damage; aggravated trespass, Defences: 'concealed' necessity; abortion. Even professional sport should have an element of fun while the players are, in the more extreme cases, given criminal as well as civil law protection (see R v Johnson (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 343 and R v Lloyd (1989) CLR 513 dealing with injuries inflicted on the rugby field in "off the ball" incidents). R v Clarence had not considered the issue of consent because consent to sexual intercourse was assumed to have been given at the beginning of marriage. This follows the rise in the use of the rough sex defence by defendants in cases of homicide, where defendants claim that death was caused from sexual activities that went wrong. In 1998, the Home Office issued a consultation paper entitled Violence: Reforming the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 rejecting the Law Commission's recommendation that there should be offences for the intentional or reckless transmission of disease. The injuries were inflicted during consensual homosexual sadomasochist activities. Breeze v John Stacey & Sons Ltd; CA (Peter Gibson, Judge, Clarke LJJ) 21 June 1999. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. . r v emmett 1999 case summary Best Selling Author and International Speaker. He said: Society is entitled and bound to protect itself against a cult of violence. GPs were synthesized from alkali-activated metakaolin using H2O2 as a blowing agent and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant.
Body Modification: A Case of Modern Maiming?: R v BM [2018] EWCA Crim U.S. Reopens Emmett Till Investigation, Almost 63 Years After His Continue with Recommended Cookies, The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. The learned judge, in giving his ruling said: In this case, the degree of actual and potential harm was such and also the degree of unpredictability as to injury was such as to make it a proper cause [for] the criminal law to intervene. After that, 5 ml of APTES was added and the system was refluxed at 80 C for 24 hours under a nitrogen atmosphere.
PDF R v BM: Errors in the Judicial Interpretation of Body Modification (PDF) Modification and characterization of adsorbent materials and CNTs THE PRIMARY purpose of the Law Society's jurisdiction to intervene in a solicitor's practice under s 35 of and Pt I of Sch I to the Solicitors Act 1974 was the protection of the public against the activities of a dishonest or incompetent solicitor. These cases overrule the implicit ratio decidendi of Clarence that non-physical injuries can be injuries within the scope of the Offences Against the Person Act and without the need to prove a physical application of violence, Lord Steyn describing Clarence as a "troublesome authority", and, in the specific context of the meaning of "inflict" in section 20, said expressly that Clarence "no longer assists". R v Emmett; CA, Crim Div (Rose LJ, Wright, Kay JJ) 18 June 1999. WHERE A party to litigation saw another party's documents without privilege being claimed for them, he was. He was convicted of occasioning actual bodily harm. John Cherryman QC, John L Davies (W.J. why was carrie's sister dropped from king of queens . But in the context of sadomasochism, Lord Mustill in R v Brown (1993)[2] has set the level just below actual bodily harm. Breeze v John Stacey & Sons Ltd; CA (Peter Gibson, Judge, Clarke LJJ) 21 June 1999.
Weight centile crossing in infancy: correlations between successive Thus, while the criminal law is not generally a means of escaping civil obligations, the criminal courts may be able to offer some assistance to the gullible by returning their property or making compensation orders. The House of Lords ruling on consent and the limits of the intrusion of criminal law in peoples sexual relationships has been criticised by many. The prosecution alleged that the injuries left were inconsistent with . Citing: Cited - Regina v Emmett CACD 18-Jun-1999 The defendant appealed against conviction after being involved in sexual activity which he said was not intended to cause harm, and were said to be consensual, but clearly did risk harm. To improve the utility of these nanostructures, there is a need to control the degradation profile relative to specific . The Criminal Law list is current up to the Last Updated date above and may not include recent decisions. Rose LJ, Wright and Kay JJ [1999] EWCA Crim 1710, [1999] No. The key issue facing the Court was whether consent was a valid defence to assault in these circumstances. The Court held that the identity of the defendant was not a feature which, in that case, precluded the giving of consent by the patient. 1824). nuragic and contemporary art museum case study.
Emmett v. Regions Bank, 238 Ga. App. 455 | Casetext Search + Citator Although Haggart was bigger, and trained as a boxer, Jobidon landed one punch directly in Haggart's face, which knocked him unconscious and he fell on a hood of a car. Narrow pore size distribution was observed with the maxima at 0.97 and 1.4 nm, respectively, well in line with the predicted pore diameter from structural analysis. In this regard, they overturned the ruling of the original judge. Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in, Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile.
Criminalisation & Consent: Sadomasochism in R v Brown On the first occasion he tied a plastic bag over the head of his partner. On the second, he poured lighter fluid over the victim and set it alight. 9901191 ZR; The Times, 15 October 1999: Court of Appeal (EWCA Crim) Consent; sado-masochism; bodily harm; non-fatal assaults: 90: . Minutes of the LCCSA AGM on 16/11/18 at the Crypt, Risk Assessment "Toolkits" for London Magistrates' Courts, HMCTS Email address to report Covid-19 related information (London Magistrates Courts), Joint Media Release HMCTS Safety Concerns 20.01.2021, New ID card gives solicitors fast-track court access, Karl Turner MP Coronavirus Legal Aid Report, A new report re vulnerable children, by charity Just for Kids Law, Video message from the Lord Mayor of London and the Lord Chief Justice, LCCSA Letter to the Government 18th July 2022, Letter to Solicitors with Cases at Harrow and Isleworth Crown Courts 1st Sept 2022, Youth Justice Board Recovery Guidance for Youth Offending Teams, End of Met PS Virtual Remand Hearings from 8/12/20, LCCSA Call for Action During state of Emergency, Letter to Legal Representatives attending police custody suites, APPG on Legal Aids Westminster Commission on the Sustainability of Legal Aid, Archbold 2021 10% offer for LCCSA Members, Magistrate Courts will remain open on Monday 19th September, Tuesday Truth-Lammy Report and the Justice Charter, Breach of Bail Arrest Warrants VRH Pilot Note, Statement by LCCSA President Hesham Puri Voting with our Feet 5th September 2022, Harrows spring update on listings and productions, CLSA invites LCCSA Members to their Annual Conference Friday 14th October, LCCSA Photos from the Annual Summer Party 2017, The London Advocate Summer Edition 2020, Stepping into Shoe Print and Footwear Mark Analysis, Sentencing young adults getting it right first time. R v Wilson (1996), which involved a case where a husband branded his wife's buttocks, upheld that consent can be a valid defence. SHARE. On the first occasion he tied a plastic bag over the head of .
SulfonicPendent VinyleneLinked Covalent Organic Frameworks Enabling The Domestic Abuse Act: Well-Intentioned, Ill-Conceived Gross negligence manslaughter; Liability for omissions: duty of care, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/child, Liability for omissions; manslaughter; parent/non-dependent child, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; assumption of responsibility: drug takers; manslaughter, liability for omissions; contractual duty; manslaughter, Liability for omissions; creation of a dangerous situation; arson, Liability for omissions; police officer: misconduct in public office, Withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment; act/omission distinction; murder, Liability for omissions; gross indecency with a child, Liability for omissions; performance of duty: extent of duty, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured/without a licence, Causation; causing death by driving whilst uninsured; aggravated vehicle taking, Causation; intervening events; death by dangerous driving, Causation; intervening acts of third party: drug importation, Causation; intervening acts of third party; manslaughter, Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillary) Ltd, Causation; intervening act of third party; pollution; strict liability, Causation; intervening acts of third party; medical treatment; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim; assault occasioning ABH, Causation; intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: lapse of time; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: intervening act of victim; manslaughter, Causation; drug use: joint administration; manslaughter, Causation; supply of drugs; duty of care; gross negligence manslaughter, Causation; pre-existing medical condition: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; Jehovah's Witness: 'take your victim as you find them'; manslaughter, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; murder, Causation; intervening act of victim: suicide; recognisable psychiatric injury; manslaughter/GBH, Mens rea, intention; motive; doing acts likely to assist the enemy, Re A (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Separation conjoined twins: civil declaration; intention; necessity; murder, Motive; moral purpose; conspiracy to commit breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911, Malice; Mens rea; Offences against the person, Intoxication; mens rea; recklessness; specific/basic intent; arson, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; murder, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea; continuing act; assault, Transferred malice; unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter, Attorney General's Reference (No.3 of 1994), Transferred malice; murder/manslaughter; GBH rule, Transferred malice; accessories: joint enterprise; murder; Tyrell principle, Mistake; presumption of mens rea: strict liability; inciting a girl under 14 to commit an act of gross indecency, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability, Gammon Ltd. V Attorney General of Hong Kong, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; ECHR Art.7, Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; funding terrorism, Presumption of mens rea: strict liability; freedom of expression; proscribed organisations; terrorism offences, Strict liability; rape of a child; ECHR arts.